
VERDAD
THE TRUTH
REASON 1
It is evident that a lot of Reverend Al Sharpton’s tactics are similar to the tactics that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. employed when he lead the fight against injustice and inequality in the country. However, Al Sharpton does differ from Martin Luther King in that Sharpton is not as efficient in gathering all the information needed to fight and ask for justice on a case or issue. Bill O’Reilly, from the Fox News’ show The O’Reilly Factor, argues that civil rights leaders like Al Sharpton advocate on an issue without the proper back up information, causing more harm and divide within the community. These people are referred as "racial agitators" who protest against the "injustice of the killing of Michael Brown" without all the necessary evidence from the case (O’Reilly). O’Reilly argues that people listen to what Al Sharpton says because he is seen as a leader. This, he urges, can be troubling and cause more harm to a situation (O’Reilly).
In 1987, Al Sharpton represented Tawana Brawley, a black teenage girl, in the case that alleged that she was attacked and raped by a New York police officer, a prosecutor and a state trooper (Turley para. 1). Many argued that Al Sharpton rushed into protesting the "injustice" that occurred before gathering all the information about the case. Jonathan Turley writes in his article "Twenty-Five Years Later, Tawana Brawley Tracked Down in Virginia and Hit Roughly $500,000 Bill" says that the grand jury "found that the account was a hoax," meaning that the story and the evidence presented by Brawley was false (Turley para. 3). Al Sharpton’s actions caused "these men to be demonized in the relentless press conferences and marches" (Turley para. 7). One person who was affected greatly was 28-year-old Fishkill Police Officer Harry Crist, Jr., "who committed suicide a week after the false charges were made against him" (Turley para. 7). This is a prime example of how Al Sharpton’s actions are more negative than positive within the community and how not collecting all the facts can cause harm.
Today, Al Sharpton deals with cases the same way. Al Sharpton has been accused by many for not assessing all of the facts for a case. Megyn Kelly, a Fox News host, criticizes Al Sharpton for getting ahead of the facts. Like Bill O’Reilly, Kelly argues that Al Sharpton is not fully assessing the facts about the case before addressing the public. In the article "Megyn Kelly: Al Sharpton declared Michael Brown ‘didn’t use any deadly force’ against officer," by Katie Sanders, it says, " ‘If you have somebody come in and prejudge – someone you trust and rely upon – come and tell you the facts are one way, you believe him" (Sanders para. 7). Kelly continues by saying, "That’s why he is abusing his power" (Sanders para. 7). Al Sharpton falsely conveying the facts to the public is an abuse of power and also not a good example of the type of leadership that African-Americans need. Here is one speech Al Sharpton has made:
Dr. Jason Nichols, an African American studies professor at the University of Maryland, College Park, stated in one of his lectures that, "Al Sharpton ignores King’s first step of his Four-Step Nonviolence campaign, which was to collect the facts." Martin Luther King’s four steps for a non-violence campaign consisted of: a collection of facts, negotiation, self-purification and direct action. Though Sharpton and King represent two different time periods, Nichols argues that collect the facts is an important step that can be used today. Dr. Nichols argued that Al Sharpton does not fully gather all of the facts before taking direct action, which can lead to harmful outcomes. Nichols argues that this is evident in Sharpton’s past case, the Tawana Brawley case.
The Race Factor The Truth About Ferguson O'Reilly Talking Points posted by Armando Holmes
Al Sharpton: Ferguson Shooting a Defining Moment posted by Lord Rothschild